Skip to content

adding jitter parameter will help in avoiding thundering herd problem #11636

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 4.9.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gargsuraj12
Copy link

No description provided.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.


Suraj Garg seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Copy link
Contributor

@sdelamo sdelamo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You would need to sign the CLA.

@sdelamo sdelamo added the type: improvement A minor improvement to an existing feature label Apr 1, 2025
* @return The random deviation percentage between retry attempts
*/
@Digits(integer = 2, fraction = 2)
String jitter() default "0.25";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

simply adding the jitter() member to the annotation is not enough to implement the functionality

@graemerocher graemerocher marked this pull request as draft April 1, 2025 14:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: improvement A minor improvement to an existing feature
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants